Posted by WavyGravy on 9/10/2013
Who benefits from a chemical weapons attack in Syria? Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad? Really? So he provides perfect excuse to freedom-bomb
hisself into oblivion that syncs flawlessly with the coordinated
corporate-
welfare media "Red-Line-in-the-Sand" hype blitz of the last few weeks?
Or ...
these guys:
The
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is set to "mount a
major blitz" in support of US President Barack Obama's resolution to
take military action in Syria
Back in 2005, AIPAC
Executive Director Howard Kohr bragged about his role in hyping similar
WMD bullshit when the New York Sun reported, “According to Mr. Kohr,
AIPAC’s successes over the past year also include guaranteeing Israel’s
annual aid package and ‘quietly’ lobbying Congress to approve the use of
force in Iraq.” AIPAC got its Iraq War and then Israel PM Ariel
Sharon declared, after the invasion in 2003: "Everybody has to
move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge
the settlements because everything we take now will stay
ours...Everything we don't grab will go to them."
So, if you're
the one sitting on occupied Syrian land/water, say ... on the West
Bank. And the Syrian government gets disappeared by freedom-bombs. And
there's anarchy and violence and generally batshit wack-a-doodle in
what used to be Syria.
Who benefits? People grabbing as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything they take now will stay theirs?
This
Freak Flag's for them.
